SPONSORS
2024 ICRBE EXPO |
Guide foot typical material
Posted by:
Adam Lathrop
(141.197.12.---)
Date: September 07, 2016 09:21AM
Looking for info on typical guide material. Not the inserts the metal used in the guide itself. Re: Guide foot typical material
Posted by:
John E Powell
(---.dynamic.wnyric.org)
Date: September 07, 2016 09:45AM
comment deleted Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/20/2016 04:03PM by John E Powell. Re: Guide foot typical material
Posted by:
Russell Brunt
(---.lightspeed.miamfl.sbcglobal.net)
Date: September 07, 2016 01:18PM
304 grade stainless steel. Russ in Hollywood, FL. Re: Guide foot typical material
Posted by:
Mark Talmo
(---.dsl.lsan03.sbcglobal.net)
Date: September 07, 2016 02:01PM
Adam,
John and Russell are correct. Additionally, some of the lower end ocean boat guides are chrome plated and seam to corrode quickly leading me to wonder if they are regular steel under the plating. There are two common SS alloys in guide manufacturing; 304, which John stated, and also 316. While 304 offers good corrosion resistance and is less expensive, 316 is the best of all the easily obtainable SS alloys but pricier. Typically, guides stating they are SS but not which alloy are 304. Insist on 316 for salt water guides while 304 is sufficient for fresh. If price is of no concern, Titanium is the strongest and lightest while exhibiting the best corrosion resistance. Mark Talmo FISHING IS NOT AN ESCAPE FROM LIFE BUT RATHER A DEEPER IMMERSION INTO IT!!! BUILDING YOUR OWN SIMPLY ENHANCES THE EXPERIENCE. Re: Guide foot typical material
Posted by:
Michael Danek
(---.adr02.mskg.mi.frontiernet.net)
Date: September 08, 2016 10:59AM
The guide companies tell what they are using in their catalogs and on their websites. Re: Guide foot typical material
Posted by:
J.B. Hunt
(---.ppoe.dsl.logantele.com)
Date: September 09, 2016 04:22PM
Mark is spot on ! They are both considered Austenitic type Stainless (18 % Chrome and 8% Nickel). Both are non-magnetic and non corrosive. Only a slight amount of Ferrite (.08% Iron). Although the 316 has a slightly higher content of Cr and Ni than does 304. It also has 2.0 - 3.0 % Molybdenum which makes it even more corrosive resistant than 304 type SS. So, like Mark said, I would use type 304 for fresh water rods and use type 316 for salt water use. J.B.Hunt Bowling Green, KY Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/09/2016 05:01PM by J.B. Hunt. Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
|